Recently, many foreign entrepreneurs and high-net-worth individuals operating in China have received information update notices from banks requesting supplementary tax residency declarations. This is not a routine annual review, but a clear signal of the upgrade to CRS 2.0, the global tax information exchange system. Ignoring these notices could lead to account freezes, asset exposure, or even cross-border double taxation risks.
What is CRS? Why Have the Old Rules Become Obsolete?
CRS is a core tool that leverages multilateral tax agreements to exchange offshore account information, aiming to control cross-border asset tax evasion. However, during the CRS 1.0 era, there were obvious loopholes: cryptocurrencies were not within the reporting scope; offshore multi-tier structures often stopped at the corporate level without penetrating to individuals; and dual tax residents could exploit rules by "choosing one jurisdiction" for declaration to avoid information backflow. Now, CRS 2.0 has systematically closed these gaps.
Practical Case Feedback: The "Tax Identity" Dilemma for Foreign Employees Opening Accounts in China
In actual business processing, we have identified a very typical and tricky contradiction, concentrated in the "three-choice" dilemma foreign employees face when filling out bank tax information.
Bank systems typically offer the following three options:
Solely a Chinese tax resident
A non-resident
Both a Chinese tax resident and a foreign tax resident
While the classification appears clear, it has sparked significant controversy and confusion in practice. Let's take the most typical scenario as an example:
Case Background: A foreign employee whose entire work and source of income are located within China. From a tax law perspective, he undoubtedly qualifies as a "Chinese tax resident." Logically, he should choose the first option.
However, a real-world "gap" emerges, obstacles to choosing "Solely a Chinese tax resident" (Option 1): The bank requires extremely cumbersome documentation, including:
Proof of residence in China exceeding 183 days.
Tax filing records from the previous year.
A detailed personal statement describing the duration of work in China, the employer, and a solemn declaration of having no income in any other country besides China.
More critically, the statement must also include wording such as "has no relationship with any relatives in their home country."
The problem is that the vast majority of foreign employees have parents, spouses, and other immediate family members still living in their home country. Asking them to declare they have "no relatives" in their home country is nearly impossible and grossly inconsistent with the facts. Therefore, choosing Option 1 faces immense procedural resistance.
The Contradiction of Choosing "Non-resident" (Option 2): This completely contradicts the foreign employee's actual situation, as they are de facto a Chinese tax resident. Selecting this option essentially means "lying."
The Paradox of Choosing "Both a Chinese and Foreign Tax Resident" (Option 3): Many foreign employees may have already completed tax declarations in their home country, confirming they are not a tax resident there. If they then choose Option 3 in China, it would be self-contradictory and violate their legal declaration made in their home country.
Through communication with several banks, we discovered a thought-provoking reality: Faced with this dilemma, bank tellers often "suggest" that most foreign employees directly choose the second option—"Non-resident." To alleviate customer concerns, banks typically give verbal assurances like: "This information is solely for the bank's internal compliance use and will not be uploaded to the Chinese tax authority or other government departments."
The core contradiction lies here: While this "expedient measure" solves the immediate account-opening process issue, it essentially uses an "incorrect" option (non-resident) to address a "correct" fact (Chinese tax resident). It places foreign employees in a dilemma: either bend the truth to get things done smoothly or insist on the truth and face the predicament of being unable to open an account.
PHC's advice:
Your identity must match your reality. Don't just look at which country issued your passport; consider where you actually live, where your family is, and where your money is. Based on tax treaties, clearly determine which country you should pay taxes to. Do not choose an option inconsistent with the facts for convenience, or you may face tax audit risks in the future.
Conclusion
Global tax transparency is not a passing trend but an irreversible new normal. The essence of CRS 2.0 is to make it crystal clear "who owns the account, who benefits from the proceeds, and who holds control." For you, every bank compliance notice is both a signal of tightening regulation and a window of opportunity to proactively sort out risks and complete compliance adjustments for the last time.
If you have recently received a compliance update letter from your bank, or have doubts about your own tax residency status, it is advisable to seek professional cross-border tax advisory assistance as soon as possible, to avoid being passively exposed in the wave of comprehensive information exchange.
At PHC Advisory, we can offer you full support on matters regarding doing business in China, or any other issues your business may face. If you would like to know more about policies relevant to your business in Italy or Asia, please contact us at info@phcadvisory.com.
PHC Advisory is a company of DP Group: an international professional services conglomerate of companies with approximately 100 experienced professionals worldwide. We offer comprehensive services in tax, accounting, and financial consulting, including financial supervision, financial audit, internal audit, internal control over financial reporting, and support for audited financial statements and annual audits, ensuring clients' financial transparency and compliance.
Would you like to learn more about the business environment in China? Click the link and download our Practical Guides on Amazon!
The content of this article is provided for informational purposes only, financial advice must be tailored to the specific circumstances on a case-by-case basis, and the contents of this article do not legally bind PHC Advisory with the reader in any way.

